Omnivore 2

German Geothermal Project Sets Off Earthquake, Nicholas Kulish and James Glanz, New York Times

Fibres in a Cave Point to Ancient Craft Work, Henry Fountain, New York Times

Next Steps For Geoengineering, James Wilsdon, Seed Magazine

Google Working on Newspaper-killing Paywall, Michael Masnick, Techdirt

Recording Industry & Japanese Gov’t Working on Cell Phone Killer, Michael Masnick, Techdirt

Technology Doesn’t Equal Journalism, Michael Masnick, Techdirt

“Next-Gen” Wi-Fi Approved, BBC News

Xbox Speeds Up Research Results, BBC News

Robots to Revolutionize Surgery, Jane Elliott, BBC news

On the Digital Frontline of Policing, Ramon Goni Santalla, BBC News

Countdown To a UK Space Agency,  Sudeep Chand, BBC News

Africa’s Internet Journey, Rory Cellan-Jones, dot.life

Gov 2.0: Army Announces Apps For Army Competition, J. Nicholas Hoover, Information Week

VA Pulls the Plug on Disputed Study of Gulf War Illness, Eliot Marshall, Science

Omnivore 1

Underestimating Al Qaeda, Lawrence Wright, The New Yorker

It’s Always The Fixer Who Dies, George Packer, The New Yorker

The Architect of 911:  Mohammad Ata, Daniel Brook, Slate

Reality Check: Human Terrain Teams, Christian Caryl, Foreign Policy

An Agenda For NATO: Toward A Global Security Web, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Foreign Affairs

Where’s Bin Laden? Peter Bergen, The Af-Pak Channel

Sci-Fi Surgery, Michael Conroy, Wired UK

SAS Trains Lybian Troops, Thomas Harding, Daily Telegraph

The Odd Couple: Carl Jung, Wolfgang Pauli, and Mystic Numbers, Georgina Ferry, Times Literary Supplement

MI6 Officer Investigated Over Torture Allegation, Richard Norton-Taylor & Ian Cobain, The Guardian

Are Bloggers Bound by Professional Ethics?

Apparently not (always). Maybe the bigger question has to do with what we should expect of  “bloggers” as a category of media actors – and where to draw the line between blogging and journalism.

Hodge: Of Kidnapping, Milblogs and Blackouts

Exum: A Freed Reporter – and Blogging Ethics

Ricks: Thanks to the British Military

Radio Free Swat Valley

I read this op-ed in the International Herald Tribune over lunch today. More important than IHT’s crisp, newly revamped layout, and more important than the snappy title of the piece,  Douglas J. Feith and Justin Polin note a missed Af-Pak  stratcom opportunity:

ON March 5, in the outskirts of Peshawar, Pakistan, forces believed to be affiliated with the Taliban bombed the shrine of Rahman Baba (born around 1650), the most revered Pashtun poet. The attack evokes one of the grosser Taliban outrages from the pre-9/11 era: the dynamiting in 2001 of the enormous stone Buddhas in Afghanistan’s Bamiyan Valley.

It’s interesting that in the reams of studies on insurgent and terrorist messaging – which have tended to privilege the web as the virtual insurgent’s platform of choice – low tech radio’s been so neglected. Event the recent Crisis Group report on Taliban propaganda, which looked at the subject in depth, missed the boat on the importance of radio to guerrilla forces operating in large, sprawling geographies where high rates of illiteracy prevail. Anyway.

Feith and Polin:

If it had the equipment and personnel for the job, the United States could broadcast radio programs for the Pashtuns commemorating Rahman Baba’s life and poetry, thus helping to revive the collective memory of Sufism and inspiring opposition to the Taliban. Other programs could highlight the cultural and physical devastation wrought by the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

The United States conducted impressive strategic communications during the cold war. Radio Free Europe, Voice of America and other programs conveyed information and ideas that contributed to the discrediting and ultimate defeat of Soviet communism.

Pakistan’s Islamist extremists apparently know the value of strategic communications. They preach and broadcast, understanding that every non-extremist school they close, every artist they force to move, every moderate tribal leader they kill and every Sufi shrine they destroy can increase their powers of intimidation and persuasion.

The Minimum Means of Revenge

What happens when US and Chinese scientists and non-proliferation experts get together to swap notes on nuclear terminology as described in their respective languages… I suppose there’s something to be said for calling a spade a spade. I wonder how that translates?